Google Analytic

Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Analysis: How the right embraced the racist ‘replacement’ theory

The right spread the racist ‘great replacement theory’ even after a series of tragedies in which the shooter espoused it. Analysis by Aaron Blake Racists have long espoused the theory — as the Buffalo suspect apparently did — to suggest that Whites are being usurped. Meanwhile, in recent years, Republicans and conservative pundits have increasingly cast Democrats as favoring immigration in the hopes of diluting the GOP’s political power. We’ve written about the GOP’s descent into replacement theory before, but it’s worth laying out the timeline. The idea was mostly relegated to the fringes when Donald Trump first ran for president, but he did nod to it. And then it took off last year despite tragedies involving the theory in 2017, 2018 and twice in 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/05/16/gop-replacement-theory-timeline/

Sunday, May 15, 2022

Louisiana already seceded once. Does this politician want to try again?

Mitch McConnell, the Republican from Kentucky who was head honcho of the Senate when it was Republican-controlled, sat on President Barack Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court for a year. But he was quick off the mark once Trump took over. After ensconcing Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, McConnell completed the trifecta that doomed Roe by rushing Barrett's nomination through days before the election that finished Trump. If these justices are not partisan hacks, they might as well be. ~James Gill, columnist https://www.nola.com/opinions/article_792fa59a-d233-11ec-8055-0fcdd74aa6f9.html

Friday, May 6, 2022

Let’s throw out the term ‘culture wars.’ This is religious tyranny.

The right-wing justices and their supporters appear ready to reject one of the Founders’ core principles: that religion shall not be imposed by government edict. Other Republicans have given away the scheme. In his 11-point plan, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, declares: “The nuclear family is crucial to civilization, it is God’s design for humanity, and it must be protected and celebrated. To say otherwise is to deny science.” Put aside the utter incoherence (is it God or science?): The senator is explicitly calling for state power to be used in the service of his religious beliefs. And it’s no slip of the tongue. As would a number of Supreme Court justices, Scott would impose religious views while refusing to admit his views stem from a particular religious perspective. “Abortion kills human children,” Scott pronounces. “To deny that is to deny science.” Actually, he wants to mandate conduct based on the religious view that humanity/personhood starts at conception. This is not about “culture.” It is about appropriating state power to enforce theocratically driven positions. Issues dismissed as “culture” or “wokeness” inevitably boil down to whether government will diminish individual rights (e.g., a rape victim’s access to abortion) and supplant decision-making on matters, such as health care, that individuals and families jealously guard. Vice President Harris said on Tuesday at an Emily’s List gathering, reversing Roe would be “a direct assault on freedom, on the fundamental right of self-determination.” She continued: “When the right to privacy is attacked, anyone in our country may face a future where the government can interfere with their personal decisions. Not just women. Anyone.” In sum, the media’s “culture wars” shorthand is an evasion, a refusal to recognize that what is at stake are the rights and lives of those without the resources or power to defend themselves (e.g., travel out of state for an abortion). The Supreme Court is poised to roil the very essence of our constitutional tradition and strike at the heart of a pluralistic democracy. Let’s call it what it really is: state-enforced theocracy, or, if you prefer, religious authoritarianism. By Jennifer Rubin Columnist https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/05/04/culture-wars-diminishes-danger/?utm_campaign=wp_follow_jennifer_rubin&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl-jenniferrubin&carta-url=https%3A%2F%2Fs2.washingtonpost.com%2Fcar-ln-tr%2F36bfe96%2F6272895e956121755a63afec%2F5976f806ade4e26514bcc8c9%2F6%2F16%2F6272895e956121755a63afec