http://www.theadvocate.com/baton_rouge/opinion/letters/article_efc951c2-4a0a-11e6-920a-97ef2a314037.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=user-share
Michael Gerson’s recent column did a great job of exposing the moral disingenuousness of those Trump supporters who call themselves evangelical Christians.
Their actions reveal them far less Christian than they would like to claim. Donald Trump, a man with the moral certitude of a will-o’-the-wisp, has charmed the Christian right into accepting his multitude of positions on abortion, his overt racism toward Hispanics, his intolerance of religions he doesn’t like, the advocating not only torture but the killing of families of suspected terrorist and his misogyny, as well as the fact that he intends to be an authoritarian ruler. Still, they find him a morally acceptable candidate for the presidency of the United States.
What would it take to dissuade these people from voting for this morally (and four times financially) bankrupt person?
Would any real Christian really approve of such a man? Not in the Bible I read.
And his quote about Hillary Clinton, “She’s been in the public eye for years and years and yet there’s no — there’s nothing out there,” is so Trumpian. It is a statement devoid of meaning or content, the intent of which is character assassination by negative inference. How can one argue with a statement without meaning? How can anyone accept a statement without content?
Jim G.
New Orleans